There have historically been many attempts to
understand how the universe works.
There are achieved great achievements in technology and
science, by observation, experiments and tests, but
there are areas of the physics as can not be achieved with the
type of methods.
You can see the problem, number of
researchers has never been greater and all the pieces
turned many times without success.
Radiation is still an imitation of the waves on the sea.
We know nothing about how the part that controls the
absorption and emission works.
Radiation is part of atomic nucleus structure, but the core is still an unknown atomic cloud
We have knowledge of mass and energy, but we do not know
where it comes from in the universe.
We do not know why the process of the joints works in a
We has knowledge to conservation of the energy, but we do
not know why and how the system works.
You can try youself to find some points, eg. The speed of
As you can see there are some big holes in physics that
can not be explained by the general observation,
experimental and control test method.
You know that everything we see and ascertain in the
universe does not come out of nowhere, there is a system
If you put a little seed in the ground, a huge tree
This tells us that the universe works as an evolving system.
To handle this type of problem it is necessary to find out how the universe works.
You can even try if you can make a model of the universe:
In order to reduce the risk of pulling a rivet, the model should have the following properties:
The cosmic model should be as simple as possible and
consist of cosmological known fundamental elements.
The model must consist of at least two basic elements to create a mathematical function if there are more than
two elements will it cause a number of problems related to the integration with the existing physics, both
mathematical and physical side.
The model I use myself:
If you look up at the sky you will see a universe which
is large and very cold. Many believe that the universe
volume and temperature is a unified size, nobody
can prove, there might as well be other solution opportunities between the two
No matter which opinion one has about this, it fits perfectly into what I
need to create a function in the universe and develop
No matter what model of the universe one wants to
use, it is not possible because of the infinite spread
of the universe to prove directly that a particular
model is the right one.
I have chosen a model where I from a starting point build an evolving skeleton, and
thereafter downloads control elements from the commonly
recognized classical physics with the belonging formulas.
If we look at the universe's volume, we note that it can not be moved.
For example. If you move a coffee cup from a to b,
you can note that you have not moved the volume but the energy in the volume.
This does not mean that the volume has no meaning.
I use among other volume as volume parameter for calculating the size of the mass.
It is in the temperature part we have to find our start functions. In the existing physics
is it only Kelvin that has something that can be used. Kelvin's work is that he uses the Brownian motion in
molecular compounds and follows them with the temperature drop, for they eventually ceases and thus
lays down the absolute zero of motion in molecules.
What we can deduce here is that both the temperature and the speed drops to zero, it means that we have a
parameter which occur in two different ways.
It is yet unknown how the conversion relationship between the two
is.I use speed parameter, partly because it fits into the
general well-known formulas.
Kelvin show the way to zero point, but for the sake of conservation of energy zero
can not stand alone, but
continues below zero with minus numbers, e.g. the freezing point
water is zero degrees Celsius but the scale
continues below zero.
Some believe that a temperature below zero kelvin has no meaning.
If the temperature can not go below zero, the
requirement for the conservation of energy in the
universe is not maintained and the universe has no function.
We have two paremetres forming the universe start
function and they are two variables, both operating in the
metric system.The universe have more features that can
not be proved by observation or with any known methods, but they are seen in the micro world of physics.
The basis of micro
1. The universe has a rest-point, which forms the universe starting point. I use the most logical point, zero Kelvin which is equal
to zero meters per second.
2. The temperature can slide back and forth over the
rest-point, so that the universe's total energy is
3. In order to achieve a change in the temperature to
the speed of light c, have I used a classic big bang.
4. The universe provides an increasing resistance to
displacement from the rest-point and are measured in
meters per second. A speed reflects the decrease-speed back to
Examples of how the system works:
You can start by downloading the link
classical big bang and
We can confirm that a particle's rest mass is calculated
from the speed c, but the particle has no speed. The reason is that the particles
vector points towards
the center and is locked. So the particle has a voltage of zero point but no speed, the contrast is the
kinetic mass (mass is energy) where in the vector points in the opposite direction.
The kinetic mass uses the volome of the rest mass, and kinetic mass are two parts in the same system.
The combined composition is not simple. So I have a more detailed explanation in another section.
We may look a little on radiation områet
link can be found here.
What you see is pure micro physics. The area is interesting because I want to know how the combined
vector structure in micro physics works in this known physical system.
You should be aware that there is a correlation between the mass of particles, kinetic energy and radiation, but
there is only the universe development machine to manage it all.
We are in the universe's smallest and simplest
functional parts as can be overviewed without a computer.
A particle is more than just mass, but a functional part
of the universe. Here is an example that a particle can
absorb, transform emitter radiation in a completely
different wavelength. The system attempts to equalize
with the universe zero point, but the particle has a
locked energy quantity, as throws radiation out again,
but first after it has undergone a
process within the particle
Try to imagine how small a particle is and it all
takes take place constantly with the speed of light in
all molecular structures, incidentally, is radiation
also a two parameter system and has the same properties
as a particle just with the speed
of light (a high-speed particle).
You now have a small instruction about that wath happens
in the universe do not come out of nowhere and that the
universe is an evolving physical system. You've also got
an instruction about that micro physics is a
physical and mathematical model simulation of the universe processes.
The microphysics also gives the opportunity to see
contexts in different physical structures. Mathematics comes
afterward, so if you do not accept micro physics, the radiation area
will indefinitely continue in darkness. Radiation is also a functional part in the atomic
nucleus structure, so this area will also be blacked out.